plan-for-3-towers-next-to-commercial-broadway-station-finally-heads-to-public-hearing
| | | | | | |

Plan for 3 towers next to Commercial-Broadway station finally heads to public hearing

HOME BUYERS – To get the best exclusive listings visit www.vreg.ca and go to “EXCLUSIVE DEALS”

Read More

After nearly a decade of proposals, pushback and debate, a plan to build a set of towers next to one of Metro Vancouver’s busiest transit hubs is getting a public hearing.

About 100 people have signed up to speak for and against the proposed redevelopment of a Safeway lot next to the Commercial-Broadway SkyTrain station.

The plan before council envisions three towers, with heights of 44, 38 and 37 storeys, comprising 1,044 rental homes.

Click to play video: 'Drastic changes made to Broadway-Commercial Safety redevelopment plan'

Ten per cent of those units would be secured at city-wide average market rates, while the remainder would lease for going market rates.

The proposal has generated strong feelings on both sides, with supporters arguing more housing is critically needed, particularly near transit, and opponents arguing the units won’t be affordable.

“Vancouver has a crushing shortage of housing. For decades, we have not been building enough housing, and this neighbourhood, Grandview Woodlands, is a great example of this, we basically haven’t built much new housing there since the 1970s, and as a result the population there is actually declining … despite the fact this SkyTrain station we are talking about is one fo the busiest transit hubs in the country,” Peter Waldkirch, director of Abundant Housing, told CKNW’s The Jill Bennett Show.

“Burnaby just proposed an 80-storey tower … it’s actually quite perverse, it’s backwards that we are building bigger and taller buildings than this in the suburbs than we are in the heart of the city.”

Click to play video: 'Public hearings on controversial East Vancouver development postponed again'

Speaking on CKNW’s The Jas Johal Show, he said the city should look to replicate what it did in the Broadway Plan, which is 20 per cent of units at 20 per cent below market rates.

“It is bringing nothing but 1,000 luxury rental units to our community, suites that nobody will be able to afford. And for that the city is only asking for 10 per cent of the units to be at market rent,” he said.

“This community, the majority of people can’t afford market rent.”

The proposed redevelopment would also include a 37-space child care facility, a ground-level public plaza and an upper-level courtyard.

The development has been contentious ever since it was first put forward in 2016, as part of the broader Grandview-Woodland Community Plan approved by the council led by then-mayor and now federal Housing Minister Gregor Robertson.

Neighbourhood groups had rejected a previous version of the community plan, arguing it would radically change the neighbourhood’s character, and the pushback led to a municipal citizens’ assembly whose feedback was eventually integrated into the revised 2016 plan, which included a maximum tower height of 24 storeys. A proposal for the Safeway site envisioned two towers, one of them hitting that threshold.

Click to play video: 'Grandview Woodland development tour'

A subsequent version of the proposal, with the tallest tower reaching 30 storeys and composed mostly of condos, nearly made it to a public hearing in 2022, but was sidelined by the 2022 municipal election.

Story continues below advertisement

“The economics have changed. Rents were lower a few years ago … interest rates were lower … community expectations were different. I think when this project started getting negotiated, you could argue against the need for more housing more successfully,” said Tom Davidoff, an associate professor of economics at UBC’s Sauder School of Business.

Davidoff said the pressure to get new units built and to comply with the provincial and federal governments’ transit-oriented density requirements will likely weigh in the project’s favour.

The site would sit virtually on top of the intersection of two SkyTrain lines and the 99-B Line bus route. It’s TransLink’s third-busiest transit hub, and saw more than 6.2 million boardings in 2023.

“If you can’t have density at the intersection of streets named Commercial and Broadway, where there is a major transit intersection, I don’t know where you want people to go,” Davidoff said.

Share this page

Similar Posts

  • | | | | | | |

    NDP on TMX pipeline: We didn’t want it. They built it. So let’s use its full potential

    Article content Eby and Sharma exaggerate the degree to which the TMX is “underused … with capacity to spare” after one year of operation. Article content The Canadian Energy Regulator reports that the line has operated at about 80 per cent of its 890,000 barrel-per-day capacity since coming online in May 2024. Moreover, the performance improved in the first quarter of this year. Article content “The pipeline ran at about 85 per cent capacity during the three-month period ending in March,” Chris Varcoe reported in the Calgary Herald this week. The Globe and Mail’s Emma Garney further reported that the line “hit a high of 90 per cent” in March. Article content The demand is such that Trans Mountain has already begun test work to boost capacity by up to 10 per cent by the end of 2026. A longer-term project would add pumping stations to boost it to 1.14 million barrels a day, later in the decade. Article content So much for the B.C. NDP notion that the $34 billion pipeline is languishing through insufficient use. Article content Article content But rather than consult the country’s energy regulator or the national newspapers, perhaps Eby and Sharma were taking their lead from Steven Guilbeault. Article content Guilbeault served as environment minister in the Justin Trudeau Liberal government, where he flourished as a fan of carbon taxation and an opponent of fossil fuel expansion. Article content Carney reassigned him to the Canadian Heritage Department at about the same time as the PM reduced the carbon tax to zero and began talking up the need to expand resource production. Article content It didn’t stop the new heritage minister from wandering outside his lane last month to announce that Canada has no need of more pipelines because TMX was operating at “40 per cent capacity” and the world was approaching “peak oil production.” Article content In the first instance, Guilbeault clearly didn’t know what he was talking about and in the second, there’s much room to debate about when peak oil will be reached. Article content Article content Still, there is a capacity issue regarding the TMX terminal in Burnaby, though not one that involves the pipeline. Article content The terminal is already busy with tankers, having loaded some 741 in the first quarter of the year at a rate that fell just short of one a day in March. But tankers are unable to load fully because of the risk of grounding in Burrard Inlet. Article content The New Democrats have recognized the limitation and come out in support of a federal proposal to dredge Burrard Inlet to a depth that full tankers can traverse. Article content Leading the call is Energy Minister Adrian Dix. As NDP leader, Dix’s snap decision to oppose TMX in the midst of the 2013 election campaign contributed to his loss to Christy Clark. Article content Now that the line is running, Dix supports maximizing its use. “We built it. We paid for it. We should use it,” he says, taking a realistic view of a project that cost him much. Article content Article content Article content

    Share this page
  • |

    Questions to ask advisors and condominium experts

    All of the information you need from the experts before buying a condominium. Before you purchase a new or resale condominium, you should consult with a number of advisors and condominium experts. The following questions will help you assess their qualifications. Of course, condominium markets vary and the intensity of a particular market can influence…

    Share this page
  • | | | | | | | | |

    Latest Broadway Plan Tower Application is for 127 Units at East 14th & Prince Edward

    The latest Broadway Plan rezoning application is for an 18-storey tower at 360 East 14th Avenue in the Mount Pleasant area of East Vancouver. The site is located just West of Mount Saint Joseph Hospital. The plan for the site includes: 137 units with 20% of the floor area for below-market rental units; a total density of 6.50 FSR; A building height of 186 ft. This application is being considered under the  Broadway Plan . The architect for the project is Stuart Howard. The full application can be viewed here: https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/360-e-14-ave Comments are closed.

    Share this page
  • | | | |

    Buying a New Home: 10 Mistakes to Avoid

    WARNING: Buying a new house or a condo from the developer’s sales office is always very exciting, but if you are not very familiar with the whole process, it might cost you THOUSANDS of $$$ and many legal problems. Remember that the new development sale offices are established by the developer, and the agents working there are…

    Share this page
  • | |

    Buying with 5% Down: What You Gain (and What You Give Up)

    You’ve got two choices: Save for years to hit 20% down. Buy with 5% down and get in the market now. Both come with baggage. One delays your wealth. The other costs more to build it. If you’re staring down today’s home prices thinking “I’ll never save enough”—you’re not alone. But before you jump into a 5% down mortgage, understand this: Getting in early isn’t free. It just feels like it. Let’s break down exactly how low-down payment mortgages work, where they help, and where they bite you. ⚙️ The Mechanics: How 5% Down Works in Canada Here’s what CMHC and the other insurers allow: Under $500,000? Minimum 5% down. $500K to $999K? 5% on the first $500K + 10% on the rest. Up to $1.5 million? As of December 15, 2024, you can now qualify for an insured mortgage—with the same down payment structure: 5% on the first $500K and 10% on the portion between $500K and $1.5 million. This new $1.5M cap opens the door for more buyers in high-cost markets to enter the game with a smaller upfront investment. And if you put down less than 20%, you’re taking on default insurance—a premium tacked onto your mortgage. That cost? Between 2.8% and 4% of the loan, depending on your down payment. And yes, it’s usually rolled in, which means you pay interest on the insurance too. ✅ What You Gain by Putting Down Less 1. Faster Market Access Waiting to save 20% while home prices climb is like trying to fill a leaky bucket. A 5% down payment gets you in the game now, not 3 years from now when prices are higher and you’re still behind. 2. Insured Mortgage = Lower Rates Lenders love insured mortgages. The risk’s off their books. That means they’ll often give you better interest rates than someone with 20% down and no insurance. 3. Optionality Buying with 5% down doesn’t lock up your liquidity. You keep cash in the bank. And if life happens—job change, relationship shift, whatever—you’re not deep underwater. ❌ What You Sacrifice (and It’s Not Small) 1. Higher Monthly Payments You’re borrowing more. And adding insurance to your loan. That’s a double whammy. The monthly hit is higher—no way around it. 2. More Interest Over Time Bigger mortgage = more interest. Even if your rate is sharper, the total interest paid is higher because your loan balance is bloated. 3. Slower Equity Buildup In the first few years, you’re barely touching principal. Most of your payment feeds the bank. Add that to the higher balance and you’re building wealth at a crawl. 4. Less Refinance Flexibility Insured mortgages restrict your options. Want to pull equity out later? Refinance with a different lender? Good luck. Your flexibility is capped unless you re-qualify and re-insure (if even allowed). 📈 The Power of Leverage: Turning 5% into 20% With 5% down, you’re getting 20x leverage on your money. That means for every 1% the property value increases, you get a 20% return on your initial investment. Let’s break it down: Purchase Price: $300,000 Down Payment (5%): $15,000 If the property value rises 1% to $303,000, that’s a $3,000 gain. Return on your $15,000 down payment? 20% ($3,000 ÷ $15,000) This is one of the reasons homeownership often outpaces renting in the long run. Even modest price increases can significantly boost your equity when you’re highly leveraged. Think about it: If you had to save 100% of the cash to buy the property, do you realistically believe you would ever be able to own a home? Depending on market conditions, the longer you wait, the more ground you could lose. Most people think mortgage default insurance only protects the lender. But it can also protect you. Some insurers offer support programs to help homeowners through temporary financial troubles—like a job loss, illness, divorce, or natural disaster. These programs typically work by: Offering payment deferrals during a tough period Extending amortization periods to lower payments Setting up shared payment plans (where the insurer covers part of the mortgage payment) Adding missed payments to the loan balance (capitalizing arrears) Restructuring mortgage terms to fit a new financial reality For example, Sagen’s Homeowner Assistance Program (HOAP) has helped over 63,000 Canadian families avoid losing their homes, with a success rate of over 90% . Knowing that your default insurance can act as a safety net if unexpected hardships arise can provide extra peace of mind. 🎯 The Real Question Do you want in now—knowing the trade-offs—or do you want to wait, save more, and potentially miss out? There’s no right answer. If your income is stable, you’re staying put for 5+ years, and you’ve stress-tested your budget? 5% down might be a smart move. But if you’re stretching, or banking on appreciation to bail you out? Be careful. A hot market can cool. And higher payments don’t feel so hot when rates jump or life gets messy. Final Take Buying with 5% down is like using a credit card to grab a seat at the wealth table. You’ll pay for it—but you’ll own something. It’s not free. It’s not cheap. But it might be smarter than waiting—depending on your market, your goals, and your risk tolerance. So don’t ask, “Can I buy with 5%?” Ask: “What will it cost me if I don’t?” Then run the numbers. Talk to a real mortgage strategist. And make

    Share this page