Repairs, Renos, or Red Tape
| | | |

Repairs, Renos, or Red Tape? Making Sense of Rental Property Expenses in Canada

Picture this: You’ve just picked up the keys to your dream rental property. It’s not perfect—yet. There’s a leaky faucet, the floors look tired, and the kitchen hasn’t been updated since disco was cool. 

Naturally, you’re itching to whip out your toolkit (or your contractor’s phone number) and make it shine. But before you dive into that HGTV-worthy renovation, there’s one thing you should know: 

The difference between repairs and maintenance vs. capital costs can save—or cost—you a small fortune at tax time.

In the Canadian rental market, confusion on this topic is common. Let’s clear it all up by weaving in some real-life examples and practical tips, so you can confidently plan your property improvements and avoid CRA hassles.

1. The Battle of Two Expenses

Repairs and Maintenance (a.k.a. R&M) are basically the band-aids and tune-ups that keep your place running smoothly. Capital Costs are the big lifts—the “major surgery” that dramatically extends your property’s life or significantly boosts its value.

Why does this matter? Because R&M can be deducted in full from your rental income this year, while capital costs must be deducted gradually over time through something called Capital Cost Allowance (CCA).

2. Repairs and Maintenance: Your Friendly Neighbourhood Fixes

  • What it is: Minor fixes that restore something to its previous working condition. Think of it like maintenance on your car: you’re not buying a brand-new engine, you’re just replacing a worn-out filter or fixing a leaky hose.
  • Real-World Examples:
    • Replacing a broken doorknob with a similar one.
    • Patching a small hole in the roof (rather than re-roofing the entire house).
    • Replacing a leaky kitchen faucet or re-tiling a chipped section in the bathroom.

Why it’s awesome: You get to deduct these costs immediately from your rental income, which can significantly lower your tax bill this year. Think of R&M like your “instant gratification” category. 

3. Capital Costs: Leveling Up Your Property

  • What it is: Expenses that make your property better than it was or lengthen its lifespan by a good margin. This could be the real estate equivalent of installing a brand-new engine in your car—something that makes it purr for years.
  • Real-World Examples:
    • Renovating the kitchen top to bottom with high-end cabinets, granite countertops, and a sparkling new tile floor.
    • Installing brand-new windows throughout the house to improve energy efficiency.
    • Building an extra room, adding a deck, or finishing a basement.

Why it matters: Since these are seen as investments that boost the long-term value of your property, the government says you can’t deduct the full amount in a single year. You’ll have to spread out the expense over time. This is done through CCA, which feels like a small nibble each year rather than one big gulp.

4. The Grey Areas: “Is This a Repair or an Upgrade?”

Rental property owners often find themselves stuck in a grey area. Here’s a little cheat sheet:

  • Floors
    • Fixing or replacing a few broken tiles or sections of laminate? Likely R&M.
    • Ripping out every floorboard and installing high-end hardwood? That’s probably capital.
  • Appliances
    • Repairing a broken washing machine motor? R&M.
    • Upgrading from your 20-year-old fridge to a fancy stainless-steel smart fridge? Sounds like capital (you’re substantially improving it).
  • Doors & Windows
    • Fixing a single cracked window or replacing a door with a similar model? R&M.
    • Swapping out every window with top-of-the-line, energy-efficient ones? Capital—your property just got a long-term boost.

5. The “Oh No, I Deducted Everything!” Scenario

Imagine: You assume you can write off an entire kitchen remodel in one go. You file your taxes, reduce your rental income to almost zero, and pat yourself on the back—until the CRA sends you a letter. If they decide you misclassified a major renovation as a simple repair, they can reassess your return, leading to extra taxes, interest, or even penalties. It’s no fun to open the mailbox and find that letter.

Pro Tip: Always keep receipts, invoices, and before-and-after photos. Document any conversations with contractors about what was done. If you ever need to show that a change was just “like-for-like” rather than a major upgrade, this evidence can be your saving grace.

6. Timing & Strategy: Smart Moves for Savvy Investors

  • Plan Your Upgrades
    Got a big project in mind? Understand that major renovations might not give you an immediate tax deduction. Factor that into your cash-flow and ROI calculations.
  • Itemize, Itemize, Itemize
    If you’re doing a bigger project that includes both basic fixes (R&M) and grand upgrades (capital), ask your contractor for separate invoices or a detailed breakdown. This way, you can properly categorize each expense.
  • Think Long Game
    Sometimes it’s better to do smaller repairs incrementally, rather than one massive overhaul. You get to claim those repairs right away. On the flip side, if you’re gunning for top-of-the-line finishes to attract higher-rent tenants, a well-planned capital improvement can pay off in the long run—just know you’ll depreciate that expense over time.
  • Ask a Pro
    If you’re unsure about a specific expense, consult a Canadian real estate-savvy accountant or a tax lawyer. They’ll help you avoid guesswork so you don’t wind up on the CRA’s radar.

7. Closing Thoughts: Balance is Key

Being a landlord isn’t just about collecting rent—it’s also about making strategic financial moves. The best rental owners understand that while quick fixes can keep tenants happy and costs low today, thoughtful capital improvements can raise property value and rental potential tomorrow.

So, the next time you’re eyeing that outdated bathroom or creaky front door, ask yourself:

  • Am I restoring it to what it was, or am I giving it a major upgrade?

Armed with this knowledge—and your receipts in order—you’ll breeze through tax season with fewer headaches and more confidence in your property’s profitability.

Disclaimer: This article is meant for general information only and does not replace professional tax advice. Always speak with a qualified accountant or tax expert to address your specific situation.

Share this page

Similar Posts

  • | | | |

    This is how Canada’s new GST cuts on home sales up to $1.5 million for first-time buyers will work

    Prime Minister Mark Carney is fulfilling one of the key promises the Liberal party made during the recent federal election campaign, specifically relating to eliminating the federal five per cent Goods and Services Tax (GST) on home prices for first-time homebuyers. “My government has a mandate to bring down costs. We are delivering this mandate by cutting taxes — so Canadians keep more of their paycheques to spend where it matters most,” said the prime minister, with the specific plans for the GST cuts now released following King Charles III’s speech from the throne on Tuesday. This will be applied as a rebate — the First-Time Home Buyers’ GST Rebate. For first-time buyers only, there will be zero GST applied on new homes sold at up to $1 million. For new properties bought at a price of between $1 million and $1.5 million, there will be a reduced GST for first-time buyers and their new homes. This means that for homes priced at up to $1 million, first-time buyers will save up to $50,000 by not having to pay the GST. Buyers with new, more expensive homes will be eligible for a reduced GST rebate, which falls incrementally from home prices of $1 million to $1.5 million. For example, a home price of $1.1 million would be eligible for a 20 per cent rebate of $40,000, a home price of $1.25 million would be eligible for a rebate of $25,000, and a home price of $1.4 million would be eligible for a rebate of $10,000. A “new home” purchase is defined as property bought from a new home by a builder, a self-built home or a self-contracted new home, or an acquisition of shares of a co-operative housing corporation. Individuals are eligible for the rebate if they are adults and Canadian citizens or permanent residents. As well, they must not have lived in a home that they owned or that their spouse or common-law partner owned in the calendar year or in the four preceding calendar years. This existing ownership status consideration exists both within and outside Canada. At least one of the purchasers in a sale must be a first-time buyer for use as their primary residence, with this individual required to occupy the home following the sale. The sale agreement must be made between May 27, 2025 and Dec. 31, 2030. Homes that have yet to be built under the agreement must begin construction before 2021, with substantial completion by no later than the end of 2035. For rebates for owner-built homes, an eligible individual — at least one of the owner-builders who qualify as a first-time homebuyer — can recover up to $50,000 of the GST or the federal part of the rebate. Construction on the property must begin on or after May 27, 2025, with substantial completion by the end of 2036. And as for the rebate through the co-operative housing corporation share acquisition, an individual can similarly claim up to $50,000. The acquisition and construction timelines are the same for this option. This amounts to an adjustment, expansion, and refinement of Carney’s promise made during the election campaign to eliminate the GST on “new and substantially renovated” home sales up to $1 million for first-time buyers. Conservative party leader Pierre Poilievre vowed to axe the GST for new homes up to $1.3 million, accounting for the higher home prices in markets such as Metro Vancouver and Greater Toronto. Carney’s policy move is endorsed by the Canadian Home Builders’ Association (CHBA), which states that they have been advocating for such changes for a long while, and that these regulations have not changed since the introduction of GST in 1991. They say the federal government at the time originally committed to adjusting the GST New Housing Rebate thresholds every two years to reflect changes in housing prices and protect housing affordability over time. But these thresholds have not been changed for about 35 years now. Prior to this week’s policy details announcement, the federal government offered a smaller rebate amount of up to $6,300 or 36 per cent of the GST payment that would be required for a home that costs $350,000 or less. If the home costs more than $350,000, the rebate is gradually reduced, with the rebate reaching zero for a home price of $450,000 and over. “For years, CHBA has been advocating for a change to the GST thresholds on new construction homes to help address housing affordability challenges in regions across the country, and this measure is a very positive step forward for Canadians,” said Kevin Lee, CEO of CHBA, in a statement. “Previously, without details around the implementation of this measure, Canadians wishing to enter the housing market were holding out on buying a new construction home, which results in fewer home starts, so it is encouraging that today first-time buyers can have the confidence to move forward.” But Lee suggests the rebate thresholds should be more expansive to provide a greater number of homeowners with relief. CHBA wants to see the zero GST threshold increased to new home prices of $1.5 million, with the gradual reduction kicking in for prices between $1.5 million and $2 million, which would expand the eligibility for first-time homebuyers in Metro Vancouver and Greater Toronto, where there are higher home prices. They are also urging the federal government to expand the rebate to all new homes

    Share this page
  • | |

    A market made for buyers is missing buyers

    Real Estate Market Report for March 2025 Home sales registered on the MLS® in Metro Vancouver for March were the lowest since 2019 for the same month, while active listings continued their upward trend. Sales The Greater Vancouver REALTORS® (GVR) reports that residential sales in the region totalled 2,091 in March 2025, a 13.4 percent…

    Share this page
  • | | | | | |

    Nearly 4,300 properties in Broadway Plan and Cambie Plan areas to be proactively rezoned by the City of Vancouver

    The City of Vancouver is moving forward with a sweeping proposal to proactively rezone thousands of properties in the Broadway Plan and Cambie Corridor Plan areas, as part of an ambitious effort to streamline the development process and boost housing supply near existing and future SkyTrain stations. In next Tuesday’s public meeting, City Council is expected to endorse City staff’s recommendation to refer bylaw amendments to a future public hearing for deliberation and final decision, which would likely be held in September or October — after the forthcoming summer break. This follows City staff’s public consultation beginning in March 2025, when they first announced the proposal. In an interview with Daily Hive Urbanized early this year, Josh White, the City of Vancouver’s general manager of planning, urban design, and sustainability and director of planning, also outlined many of these forthcoming changes. More details have now been released. If approved by City Council later this year, this would introduce standardized zoning for low-rise, mid-rise, and high-rise residential buildings — generally aligning with the existing prescriptions and stipulations of the property’s location under the Broadway Plan or Cambie Corridor Plan, while also considering more recent economic and financial viability factors. Generally, R3 zones would allow low-rise apartments up to six storeys — or eight storeys with affordable housing, and a floor area ratio (FAR) density of a floor area up to three times the size of the lot. R4 zones would support mid-rise buildings, typically around 12 storeys and a FAR density of up to 4.0. R5 zones would permit high-rise towers up to 22 storeys and a FAR density of up to 6.5, depending on the proximity to SkyTrain stations and affordability requirements. It is noted that FAR densities will be retained, but a more generous maximum building height will be considered to accommodate a greater range of design approaches due to varying site conditions and on-site public spaces and landscaping. Through such City-initiated rezoning over large swaths of neighbourhoods, this eliminates the need for property owners, developers, and builders to submit an individual rezoning application for their project. Instead, such projects on a City-initiated rezoned site can go straight to the development permit application, which will save applicants costs related to City fees and hiring architects and consultants to achieve the rezoning regulatory step, as well as reducing opportunity costs and added construction costs from inflation as a result of a longer timeline. City staff estimate that these blanket zoning reforms over the qualifying properties will shave 12 to 15 months off the overall development timeline. As well, this will reduce City staff’s time set aside for reports and public hearings with City Council, enabling them to reallocate resources to other tasks and priorities. So far in 2025, rezoning applications in the Broadway Plan and Cambie Corridor Plan account for about 40 per cent of all public hearings. In sites where a tower form is permitted and complex site conditions also exist — such as tower per block limit policies, building shadowing considerations, and contaminated soils, a “rezoning-to-district” process would still be required. This rezoning-to-district process would be streamlined and shorter than the standard rezoning process. The overwhelming majority of these properties are located within the Broadway Plan area, specifically sites closest to the Millennium Line’s future stations on the Broadway extension, as well as southern areas within the area plan. For the Cambie Corridor Plan area, the properties are clustered near the Canada Line’s Oakridge-41st Avenue Station. In total, the City-initiated rezoning would apply to 4,294 parcels across the Broadway Plan and Cambie Corridor Plan areas. City of Vancouver City of Vancouver City of Vancouver Over the last few years, the municipal government performed some notable City-initiated rezonings of large single-family neighbourhood areas in the Cambie Corridor Plan, enabling more expedited townhouse developments as already prescribed by the area plan. However, the forthcoming changes are the largest standardized rezoning in Vancouver’s history, and align with the Government of British Columbia’s legislated requirements for the City and other municipal governments. This specifically aligns with provincial legislation relating to transit-oriented development at designated Transit-Oriented Areas and other regulatory changes. As well, through these changes, the City will standardize affordable housing requirements using newly enabled provincial inclusionary zoning powers. Additionally, the real estate industry and provincial officials have called individual site-specific rezoning applications as redundant if the proposed uses and built form are already enabled by an area plan. In addition to aligning with the Broadway Plan and Cambie Corridor Plan, the changes also follow the City’s 2022-approved Vancouver Plan. While there was strong support for the initiative during the public consultation earlier this year — especially for its potential to speed up much-needed housing — concerns were raised about neighbourhood character, infrastructure capacity, and construction impacts. City staff responded by noting that all developments will still undergo design review, and there will still be an opportunity for public input at the development permit application stage. Enhanced tenant protections will remain in place for areas with existing rental housing. A time-limited approach will allow current rezoning applicants to transition into the new zoning framework without redoing tenant relocation plans, as long as they submit development permits within one year of bylaw enactment. Currently, there are about 40 in-stream rezoning applications involving Tenant Relocation Plans within the proposed City-initiated rezoning areas. It is noted that some of these project applicants may withdraw their

    Share this page
  • | | |

    Refinancing Versus Selling Your Investment Property

    In today’s news, it’s common to hear stories about Canadian real estate investors who bought at the market peak a few years ago and now feel buyer’s remorse as property values are sinking in 2025. Even investors who entered the market earlier than 2022 are struggling to shoulder higher carrying costs against a less-active rental market. Mortgage, credit card, and automobile delinquencies are also up, especially in Ontario. On top of this, the average non-mortgage debt for Canadian consumers climbed up 2.74% in the first quarter of the year to reach $21,859. With many homeowners under financial stress, investors may be considering their options, namely to hold, to refinance, and (as a last option) to sell. Costs of Refinancing vs. Selling To help illustrate the costs of refinancing versus selling, let’s take one example of an investor who currently owns a two-bedroom condo in Downtown Toronto, which he is renting out. This property is currently worth $800,000, which is a bit devalued from the market peak 3 years ago. He has owned it for a while, so his mortgage loan is only about $400,000. His carrying costs are high because he renewed his mortgage term when interest rates were around 5%, but he is nearing the end of his term and interest rates are much lower. His daughter is about to go to college, so he wants to help her cover her tuition and living expenses. Therefore, he is considering refinancing or selling his condo investment property to reduce his monthly financial burden and have extra funds to help his daughter. Let’s look at the cost breakdown of both options. Refinancing Selling Appraised Home Value $800,000 Current Mortgage Loan $400,000 Cost to Refinance or Sell (agent/broker fees, mortgage penalty, legal costs) $2,000 $50,000 Capital Gains Tax N/A $92,000 New Mortgage Loan $600,000 N/A Money Extracted Minus Costs $198,000 $257,000 In the short term, selling can provide more value for this investor, as the difference between refinancing and selling is an estimated $59,000 in cash. However, this is just a quick estimate and a shallow glance at the immediate effects of selecting either option. What happens when we look deeper and project into the future? Why Selling Could Cost You More Than You Think Once you sell, you give up the three pillars of real estate wealth: leverage, capital appreciation, and cash flow. The moment you sell, it all stops—no more equity growth, no more rental income, no more long-term gain. It ends right then and there. But when you refinance instead, you get the best of both worlds: ✅ Immediate access to cash to help you now ✅ Continued growth on your $100,000 investment Over the last 25 years, home prices have appreciated at an average rate of 7.5%. Even at a conservative 4% annual growth, if your property is worth $800,000, that’s $32,000 a year in equity gain—without lifting a finger. And that’s on top of your tenant paying down your mortgage and generating monthly cash flow. If you keep that property for another 15 to 25 years, the wealth potential multiplies. We’re not talking about a one-time gain of $257K. We’re talking about 10x that amount — while still holding the asset, benefiting from appreciation, and using someone else’s money (your tenant’s) to build your net worth. Refinancing keeps your wealth working. Selling shuts it down. What Are Your Long-Term Goals? Both refinancing and selling can help this investor achieve his immediate objectives: reducing his carrying costs and sending his daughter to college. However, in the long run, they will deliver different results. Therefore, it is crucial for any investor to keep their long-term goals in mind. Short-Term: Reduce Current Debt and Financial Strain If you are currently under the weight of heavy debts (including multiple mortgages, credit card debt, or other loans) and your carrying costs are growing out of hand, you may consider selling your property to tackle both of these problems at once. The net proceeds of selling your real estate investment can help you pay off other debts while immediately removing that property’s carrying costs from your monthly ledger. However, if your situation only needs a slight adjustment to be sustainable again and borrowing rates have dropped, refinancing your high-interest fixed-rate mortgage may be just what you need to carry on. By refinancing and getting a lower interest rate while extracting some optional extra cash, you may be able to lower your monthly costs and improve your cash flow to cover other expenses. You should still weigh the refinancing option against the qualifications you may need to apply for a new mortgage and the penalty of breaking your current mortgage agreement. Not everyone’s situation may allow them to refinance, as lenders will look at your debt ratios, which may have worsened since you last applied for a mortgage. Additionally, if you are near the beginning of your mortgage term or have a closed agreement, breaking your current mortgage may be extremely costly. Long-Term: Use The Equity to Spend or Invest More Refinancing offers an attractive avenue for you to extract cash equity without incurring the many expenses of selling your property. The cost to refinance for some can be quite minimal, as some mortgage brokers offer cashback incentives to cover legal fees. The equity you withdraw is not subject to capital gains tax either, which would otherwise take a huge bite out of your

    Share this page