Incorporating Your Rental Property Business
| | | | | |

Incorporating Your Rental Property Business: Should You Do It? Here’s the Scoop

So, you’ve finally taken the plunge into real estate, or maybe you’ve been collecting those sweet rental checks for a while. Either way, one question keeps popping up:

Should I incorporate my rental property business, or keep it under my personal name?

You’ve probably heard stories about big tax savings and bulletproof liability protection—but is that really the case for you?

Let’s peel back the layers and see what incorporation actually means, and whether it’s worth the paperwork, fees, and added complexity. By the end, you’ll have a clearer picture of what could work best for your situation (and hopefully a lot less confusion). 🏡💼

1. Taxes: The Good, the Bad, and the “Wait, What?”

📊 Personal vs. Corporate Tax

🔹 Personal Ownership: If you own property under your name, any rental income is taxed as part of your personal income. If you’re already in a high tax bracket (which can easily hit 45% or more in Canada), that’s a hefty bite out of your hard-earned rental income.

🔹 Corporate Ownership: If your company is a Canadian-controlled private corporation (CCPC) and your income qualifies as active business income, you might enjoy a lower tax rate (roughly 12–15% on the first $500,000).

  • The Catch: Rental income is usually deemed passive unless you own multiple properties (typically at least five) and have employees managing them. Passive income in a corporation often faces taxes closer to 50%.

🕒 The (Potential) Tax Deferral

A key perk of incorporating is that you pay personal tax only when you take out money as salary or dividends. If you’re aiming to reinvest profits (e.g., buying more properties), keeping income in the corporation can delay your personal tax bill, giving you more capital to expand faster.

💡 Quick Example:

  • Personal Income: If you earn $200,000 in net rental income, you could pay around $92,000 in taxes (46% rate).
  • Corporate Income: If taxed at 50%, you’d owe $100,000.
  • Tax Deferral Perk: Keeping the remaining $100,000 in the corporation lets you build funds to reinvest. The downside? When you eventually withdraw the money, you’ll still pay tax on dividends or salary.

💰 Losses and Write-Offs ✔ Personal Ownership: Rental losses (from renovations, vacancies, or depreciation) can reduce your overall personal income tax.
✔ Corporate Ownership: Losses stay within the corporation—you can’t offset your personal salary with corporate losses.

2. Liability: Protecting Your Nest Egg 🛡️

⚠️ Personal Ownership = Personal Risk

Imagine a tenant has a nasty fall and sues for $1 million. If the property is in your personal name, your personal assets (home, savings, investments) could be on the line if insurance doesn’t cover everything.

🏢 Corporate Ownership = A Safety Bubble (Kinda)

🔹 A corporation creates a legal separation between your personal assets and your rental properties.
🔹 However: Most lenders still require personal guarantees on mortgages, so liability protection isn’t always bulletproof.

3. Costs and Complexity: There’s No Free Lunch 💸

🔹 Formation Fees & Legal Costs: Setting up a corporation can cost a few thousand dollars.
🔹 Ongoing Accounting: Corporate tax returns, financial statements, and legal filings can cost a couple thousand per year.

📑 Extra Paperwork Galore

  • Annual corporate records, shareholder agreements, and legal compliance.
  • If you own just one or two properties, incorporation might be more trouble than it’s worth.

4. Long-Term Vision: Estate Planning & Beyond 🏦

📜 Easier Estate Planning

✔ Instead of transferring properties individually, you can transfer corporate shares, which may reduce probate fees and make succession planning smoother.

🚨 Watch Out for Capital Gains

❗ Moving a personally owned property into a corporation may trigger capital gains taxes immediately. Consult a tax expert before making a move.

💡 Example:

  • If you plan to gift rental properties to your children, transferring corporate shares can be cleaner than handing over individual deeds.

Should You Incorporate? The Verdict 🤔

✅ Go for Incorporation if:
✔️ You have (or plan to have) multiple properties generating significant income.
✔️ You reinvest profits rather than taking them out right away.
✔️ Liability protection is a key priority.
✔️ You’re thinking about estate planning or succession.

❌ Skip Incorporation if:
🚫 You own just one or two properties with modest rental income.
🚫 You rely on rental income immediately for personal expenses.
🚫 You don’t want the extra fees, accounting work, and legal complexities.

🏁 Bottom Line

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. If you’re scaling up or need extra liability protection, incorporation might be a smart move. But for small landlords, the added cost and complexity may not be worth it.

🎯 Your best bet? Talk to a tax advisor or financial planner who can tailor a strategy to your specific situation.

At the end of the day, incorporation isn’t just about taxes—it’s about how big you want to grow, how much personal risk you can tolerate, and how you plan to structure your future.

Now that you know the pros and cons, you can confidently map out the next step in your real estate journey. 🚀

Share this page

Similar Posts

  • | | | | | |

    First Time Home Buyer Incentives in Canada 2024

    There are four main incentive programs for first-time home buyers in Canada: Land transfer tax rebates, which rebate some or all of your land transfer tax. Some municipalities have down payment assistance programs (DPAPs) for first-time homebuyers. The Home Buyers’ Plan which allows you to withdraw up to $60,000 (since April 16, 2024) from your Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) without…

    Share this page
  • | | | |

    Bank Lenders Versus Mortgage Brokers.

    Where to Get Your Mortgage Loan When shopping for mortgage options, home buyers mainly choose between a direct bank lender (or another financial institution) and a licensed mortgage broker. These two primary mortgage providers, which account for an almost even split of the market, offer different access to rates, terms, and approvals, which can appeal to…

    Share this page
  • |

    BC Speculation and Vacancy Tax 2024 FAQs, Rates, Declaring & More

    What is the Speculation and Vacancy Tax?  The Speculation and Vacancy Tax is an annual tax that affects owners of vacant homes or homes that are empty more than 6 months of the year. The government has stated that it is designed to ensure that foreign owners and satellite families are fairly contributing to B.C’s…

    Share this page
  • | | | |

    This is how Canada’s new GST cuts on home sales up to $1.5 million for first-time buyers will work

    Prime Minister Mark Carney is fulfilling one of the key promises the Liberal party made during the recent federal election campaign, specifically relating to eliminating the federal five per cent Goods and Services Tax (GST) on home prices for first-time homebuyers. “My government has a mandate to bring down costs. We are delivering this mandate by cutting taxes — so Canadians keep more of their paycheques to spend where it matters most,” said the prime minister, with the specific plans for the GST cuts now released following King Charles III’s speech from the throne on Tuesday. This will be applied as a rebate — the First-Time Home Buyers’ GST Rebate. For first-time buyers only, there will be zero GST applied on new homes sold at up to $1 million. For new properties bought at a price of between $1 million and $1.5 million, there will be a reduced GST for first-time buyers and their new homes. This means that for homes priced at up to $1 million, first-time buyers will save up to $50,000 by not having to pay the GST. Buyers with new, more expensive homes will be eligible for a reduced GST rebate, which falls incrementally from home prices of $1 million to $1.5 million. For example, a home price of $1.1 million would be eligible for a 20 per cent rebate of $40,000, a home price of $1.25 million would be eligible for a rebate of $25,000, and a home price of $1.4 million would be eligible for a rebate of $10,000. A “new home” purchase is defined as property bought from a new home by a builder, a self-built home or a self-contracted new home, or an acquisition of shares of a co-operative housing corporation. Individuals are eligible for the rebate if they are adults and Canadian citizens or permanent residents. As well, they must not have lived in a home that they owned or that their spouse or common-law partner owned in the calendar year or in the four preceding calendar years. This existing ownership status consideration exists both within and outside Canada. At least one of the purchasers in a sale must be a first-time buyer for use as their primary residence, with this individual required to occupy the home following the sale. The sale agreement must be made between May 27, 2025 and Dec. 31, 2030. Homes that have yet to be built under the agreement must begin construction before 2021, with substantial completion by no later than the end of 2035. For rebates for owner-built homes, an eligible individual — at least one of the owner-builders who qualify as a first-time homebuyer — can recover up to $50,000 of the GST or the federal part of the rebate. Construction on the property must begin on or after May 27, 2025, with substantial completion by the end of 2036. And as for the rebate through the co-operative housing corporation share acquisition, an individual can similarly claim up to $50,000. The acquisition and construction timelines are the same for this option. This amounts to an adjustment, expansion, and refinement of Carney’s promise made during the election campaign to eliminate the GST on “new and substantially renovated” home sales up to $1 million for first-time buyers. Conservative party leader Pierre Poilievre vowed to axe the GST for new homes up to $1.3 million, accounting for the higher home prices in markets such as Metro Vancouver and Greater Toronto. Carney’s policy move is endorsed by the Canadian Home Builders’ Association (CHBA), which states that they have been advocating for such changes for a long while, and that these regulations have not changed since the introduction of GST in 1991. They say the federal government at the time originally committed to adjusting the GST New Housing Rebate thresholds every two years to reflect changes in housing prices and protect housing affordability over time. But these thresholds have not been changed for about 35 years now. Prior to this week’s policy details announcement, the federal government offered a smaller rebate amount of up to $6,300 or 36 per cent of the GST payment that would be required for a home that costs $350,000 or less. If the home costs more than $350,000, the rebate is gradually reduced, with the rebate reaching zero for a home price of $450,000 and over. “For years, CHBA has been advocating for a change to the GST thresholds on new construction homes to help address housing affordability challenges in regions across the country, and this measure is a very positive step forward for Canadians,” said Kevin Lee, CEO of CHBA, in a statement. “Previously, without details around the implementation of this measure, Canadians wishing to enter the housing market were holding out on buying a new construction home, which results in fewer home starts, so it is encouraging that today first-time buyers can have the confidence to move forward.” But Lee suggests the rebate thresholds should be more expansive to provide a greater number of homeowners with relief. CHBA wants to see the zero GST threshold increased to new home prices of $1.5 million, with the gradual reduction kicking in for prices between $1.5 million and $2 million, which would expand the eligibility for first-time homebuyers in Metro Vancouver and Greater Toronto, where there are higher home prices. They are also urging the federal government to expand the rebate to all new homes

    Share this page
  • | | | |

    Time vs. Timing: Why Trying to Outsmart the Market Usually Backfires

    Let’s be real. You’ve probably told yourself some version of this: “The market feels risky right now. I’ll wait until things settle.” “Rates are too high. I’ll jump in when they drop.” “Prices are up. I missed the window—maybe next year.” The problem? That window you’re waiting for—where everything is calm, cheap, and certain—doesn’t exist. It’s a mirage. And the longer you chase it, the further behind you fall. In investing, hesitation is often more dangerous than volatility. The Illusion of Perfect Timing Market timing sounds great in theory: buy low, sell high, make bank. But in real life? It rarely plays out that clean. Even the pros—with armies of analysts and AI tools—miss the mark. So what chance does the average investor have while scrolling headlines and watching rate announcements? Let’s put numbers on it. A Fidelity study showed that missing just the 10 best days in the market over 20 years can cut your returns in half. And those “best days”? They usually happen when things feel the worst—right after crashes, corrections, or full-blown panic. That’s the trap. Most people get scared, pull out, and miss the rebound. They think they’re avoiding risk, but what they’re really doing is locking in loss. Why Time in the Market Wins There’s a better way—and it doesn’t require a crystal ball. It just requires consistency. It’s called Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA), and it’s as unsexy as it is effective. Here’s how it works: You invest a set amount of money on a regular schedule (weekly, bi-weekly, monthly). You buy more when prices are low, less when they’re high. Over time, this averages out your cost per unit and reduces the impact of short-term volatility. More importantly, it removes emotion from the process. No more second-guessing. No more reacting to headlines. Just steady, methodical action that compounds quietly in the background. And yes—it works in up markets, down markets, sideways markets. Because you’re not trying to beat the market. You’re just staying in it long enough to win. Behavioral Finance Backs This Up This isn’t just opinion—it’s behavioral science. Study after study shows that people who try to time the market underperform the market. Why? Because emotion hijacks logic. Fear during dips. FOMO during rallies. The brain treats financial loss like physical pain. So we react, even when we shouldn’t. That’s why automation and discipline are your best friends. Remove decision-making from the process, and you remove the biggest threat to your returns: yourself. The Real Cost of Waiting There’s a hidden danger in doing nothing. Every month you delay, your cash sits still while inflation moves forward. Your purchasing power erodes. And the opportunity cost quietly stacks up. Waiting for “the right time” to invest is like waiting for the perfect moment to have a kid, start a business, or buy your first property. It always feels like a big leap. But the longer you put it off, the harder it gets to catch up. Bottom Line You don’t need to guess right. You need to show up consistently. Forget timing the market. That’s a gambler’s game. Instead, play the long game. Pick a date, set your investment schedule, and stick to it—whether the market is booming, busting, or somewhere in between. Because the truth is this: The market rewards participation, not perfection.

    Share this page
  • |

    Questions to ask advisors and condominium experts

    All of the information you need from the experts before buying a condominium. Before you purchase a new or resale condominium, you should consult with a number of advisors and condominium experts. The following questions will help you assess their qualifications. Of course, condominium markets vary and the intensity of a particular market can influence…

    Share this page