Dividing property and debts after you separate
| |

Dividing property and debts after you separate

ByStan S.

The law calls you and your partner spouses if:

  • you’re married, or
  • you’ve been living together in a marriage-like relationship (you might call it a common-law relationship) for at least two years.

If you divorce or separate, there are laws that say how the property and debt of spouses should be divided.

The law divides property into:

  • family property, and
  • excluded property.

If you were married, you must apply to BC Supreme Court to divide family property or debt no later than two years after you got an order for divorce or annulment.

If you were unmarried, you must apply to BC Supreme Court within two years of the date you separated.

It’s best not to agree to get a divorce until you deal with property division issues.

What’s family property?

Family property is everything either you or your spouse own together or separately on the date you separate, except excluded property. Family property includes:

  • the family home
  • RRSPs
  • investments
  • bank accounts
  • insurance policies
  • pensions
  • businesses
  • the amount that pre-relationship property increased in value since the relationship started, and
  • companion animals.

It doesn’t matter whose name the property is in. The law says it’s still family property. See section 84 of the Family Law Act to find out more about what family property is.

Companion animals

Family property also includes companion animals (pets). As of January 15, 2024, the Family Law Act states that separating or divorcing spouses can make their own agreement about the possession and ownership of pets. The agreement may include that the spouses:

  • jointly own a pet,
  • share possession of a pet, or
  • give exclusive ownership or possession of a pet to one of the spouses.

For more information about reaching agreement, see the Government of BC website. 

If you and your spouse can’t agree on who gets the family pet, one of you can apply to BC Provincial Court or Supreme Court for an order. The court will consider various factors and make a decision about which spouse gets ownership and possession of the pet. (The court can’t declare that spouses jointly own the pet or require spouses to share possession of the pet.)

People who are not spouses may be able to resolve a pet dispute by agreement or by going to the Civil Resolution Tribunal, BC Small Claims Court, or BC Supreme Court, depending on the value of the claim.

What about property one of you owned before you got together?

Any property you owned before you and your spouse lived together is called excluded property. That means:

  • it’s not family property, and
  • you don’t have to split the value of it equally if you separate.

What if the property increases in value?

But if the property increases in value while you’re living together, that increase is part of the family property. That means the increased value is divided equally between the two of you if you separate.

For example, say you owned a house before you started living with your spouse. If you separate, you won’t have to give your spouse an equal share of its total value. But you do have to give them half of the increase in the house’s value since you started living together.

Say:

  • your house was worth $250,000 when you and your spouse started living together, and
  • it’s worth $450,000 when you separate.

That means it increased in value by $200,000 during your relationship. Your spouse can get half of the increase, or $100,000 in this example.

What if you put the excluded property into joint names?

Excluded property remains excluded property, even if you put it into joint names. 

For example, say one spouse inherits $100,000 and uses it to buy property in joint names with their spouse.

Under the Family Law Act, the $100,000 stays excluded property after separation as it can be traced back to the spouse who contributed it. But a court can decide to divide excluded property in certain circumstances if a claim is made.

Excluded property also includes property that you bought with excluded property.

For example, if you owned an apartment before you got married and you sold it to buy the family home after you got married, you can “trace” the value of the excluded property (the apartment) that went towards the new family property. You don’t have to share this part of the value.

Tracing the value of the excluded property can be complicated, so you might need to get some legal advice.

What else is excluded property?

Other types of excluded property are:

  • any other assets that each of you owned before you started living together (whether you are married or not), and
  • any gifts or inheritances that only one spouse got.

See Section 85 of the Family Law Act for a full list of excluded property.

Remember: If you own something that’s excluded property, its increase in value during the time you were living together is family property. That means you need to share the amount of the increase with your spouse.

The law in this area changes and can be complicated. Get legal advice if you can. 

How are family property and family debt divided?

If you and your spouse separate, the law says that all the family property and family debt have to be divided equally between the two of you, unless you make a different agreement.

If you and your spouse have made an agreement about property and debt, you’ll divide everything the way you agreed to in the agreement.

See Write your own separation agreement for help with making an agreement if you’re separating.

If you’ve already separated from your spouse, you can still make a separation agreement. See Making an agreement after you separate for tips on how to do this.

What’s family debt?

Family debt includes all debts either spouse took on during the relationship. This includes:

  • mortgages
  • loans from family members
  • bank lines of credit or overdrafts
  • credit cards
  • income tax
  • repair costs

It also includes debts taken on after you separate if the money was used to take care of family property.

Both spouses are equally responsible for family debt:

  • whether they’re married or living together as if they’re married, and
  • even if one spouse’s name isn’t on the debt.

See section 86 of the Family Law Act to find out more about what counts as family debt.

Can creditors make you pay back your ex-spouse’s debts?

Creditors can only collect payment from the person who took on (signed for) the debt. If a couple has joint debts, creditors might decide to collect payment from only one spouse.

If you’ve separated,

  • Write to all your creditors to tell them that you’ve separated from your spouse.
  • Cancel any secondary credit cards (that is, credit cards where you’re the primary cardholder but your spouse has a second card).
  • Talk to your bank about any joint accounts you have and ask how you can protect the money.
  • Cut down the limits on any overdrafts and credit lines to what you owe now, or ask if the account can be changed so that you need two signatures to withdraw money.
  • If you need credit, ask the bank to open a line of credit in your name only.
  • Change the beneficiary to someone else if your spouse is the beneficiary of your:
    • investments,
    • RRSPs,
    • insurance, and
    • will.

This can get complicated. For example, you both need to agree about how you’ll deal with taking money from an ATM.

You might need to get some legal advice.

Can family property and family debt be divided unequally?

The court will only order family property and family debt to be divided unequally if it would be “significantly unfair” to one spouse to divide it equally.

Here are some things the court will look at when it’s deciding if it’s fair to divide family property and family debt equally:

  • How long your relationship lasted.
  • If you made any agreements other than written agreements that were signed and witnessed.
  • How the family got into debt.
  • If your family debt is worth more than the family property.
  • Each spouse’s ability to pay a share of that debt (for example, if you gave up work to stay home to look after your children, it won’t be easy for you to pay off the debt).
  • If one spouse did something to increase or lower the family debt or property value after you separated.

You can agree to an unequal division (that is, one person gets more than the other) of family property if that seems fair to both you and your spouse.

See section 95 of the Family Law Act to find out more about unequal division of property and debt.

How much time do you have to divide family property or family debt?

There are time limits for making a claim to divide property and debt. The times are different for married spouses and common-law spouses:

  • If you were married, you have to apply to BC Supreme Court to divide family property or debt no later than two years after you get an order for divorce or annulment.
  • If you were in a common-law relationship, you have to apply to BC Supreme Court within two years of the date you separated.

For more information about dividing family property and debts, see:

Share this page

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Refinancing Versus Selling Your Investment Property

    ByStan S.

    In today’s news, it’s common to hear stories about Canadian real estate investors who bought at the market peak a few years ago and now feel buyer’s remorse as property values are sinking in 2025. Even investors who entered the market earlier than 2022 are struggling to shoulder higher carrying costs against a less-active rental market. Mortgage, credit card, and automobile delinquencies are also up, especially in Ontario. On top of this, the average non-mortgage debt for Canadian consumers climbed up 2.74% in the first quarter of the year to reach $21,859. With many homeowners under financial stress, investors may be considering their options, namely to hold, to refinance, and (as a last option) to sell. Costs of Refinancing vs. Selling To help illustrate the costs of refinancing versus selling, let’s take one example of an investor who currently owns a two-bedroom condo in Downtown Toronto, which he is renting out. This property is currently worth $800,000, which is a bit devalued from the market peak 3 years ago. He has owned it for a while, so his mortgage loan is only about $400,000. His carrying costs are high because he renewed his mortgage term when interest rates were around 5%, but he is nearing the end of his term and interest rates are much lower. His daughter is about to go to college, so he wants to help her cover her tuition and living expenses. Therefore, he is considering refinancing or selling his condo investment property to reduce his monthly financial burden and have extra funds to help his daughter. Let’s look at the cost breakdown of both options. Refinancing Selling Appraised Home Value $800,000 Current Mortgage Loan $400,000 Cost to Refinance or Sell (agent/broker fees, mortgage penalty, legal costs) $2,000 $50,000 Capital Gains Tax N/A $92,000 New Mortgage Loan $600,000 N/A Money Extracted Minus Costs $198,000 $257,000 In the short term, selling can provide more value for this investor, as the difference between refinancing and selling is an estimated $59,000 in cash. However, this is just a quick estimate and a shallow glance at the immediate effects of selecting either option. What happens when we look deeper and project into the future? Why Selling Could Cost You More Than You Think Once you sell, you give up the three pillars of real estate wealth: leverage, capital appreciation, and cash flow. The moment you sell, it all stops—no more equity growth, no more rental income, no more long-term gain. It ends right then and there. But when you refinance instead, you get the best of both worlds: ✅ Immediate access to cash to help you now ✅ Continued growth on your $100,000 investment Over the last 25 years, home prices have appreciated at an average rate of 7.5%. Even at a conservative 4% annual growth, if your property is worth $800,000, that’s $32,000 a year in equity gain—without lifting a finger. And that’s on top of your tenant paying down your mortgage and generating monthly cash flow. If you keep that property for another 15 to 25 years, the wealth potential multiplies. We’re not talking about a one-time gain of $257K. We’re talking about 10x that amount — while still holding the asset, benefiting from appreciation, and using someone else’s money (your tenant’s) to build your net worth. Refinancing keeps your wealth working. Selling shuts it down. What Are Your Long-Term Goals? Both refinancing and selling can help this investor achieve his immediate objectives: reducing his carrying costs and sending his daughter to college. However, in the long run, they will deliver different results. Therefore, it is crucial for any investor to keep their long-term goals in mind. Short-Term: Reduce Current Debt and Financial Strain If you are currently under the weight of heavy debts (including multiple mortgages, credit card debt, or other loans) and your carrying costs are growing out of hand, you may consider selling your property to tackle both of these problems at once. The net proceeds of selling your real estate investment can help you pay off other debts while immediately removing that property’s carrying costs from your monthly ledger. However, if your situation only needs a slight adjustment to be sustainable again and borrowing rates have dropped, refinancing your high-interest fixed-rate mortgage may be just what you need to carry on. By refinancing and getting a lower interest rate while extracting some optional extra cash, you may be able to lower your monthly costs and improve your cash flow to cover other expenses. You should still weigh the refinancing option against the qualifications you may need to apply for a new mortgage and the penalty of breaking your current mortgage agreement. Not everyone’s situation may allow them to refinance, as lenders will look at your debt ratios, which may have worsened since you last applied for a mortgage. Additionally, if you are near the beginning of your mortgage term or have a closed agreement, breaking your current mortgage may be extremely costly. Long-Term: Use The Equity to Spend or Invest More Refinancing offers an attractive avenue for you to extract cash equity without incurring the many expenses of selling your property. The cost to refinance for some can be quite minimal, as some mortgage brokers offer cashback incentives to cover legal fees. The equity you withdraw is not subject to capital gains tax either, which would otherwise take a huge bite out of your

    Share this page
  • | | | |

    This is how Canada’s new GST cuts on home sales up to $1.5 million for first-time buyers will work

    ByStan S.

    Prime Minister Mark Carney is fulfilling one of the key promises the Liberal party made during the recent federal election campaign, specifically relating to eliminating the federal five per cent Goods and Services Tax (GST) on home prices for first-time homebuyers. “My government has a mandate to bring down costs. We are delivering this mandate by cutting taxes — so Canadians keep more of their paycheques to spend where it matters most,” said the prime minister, with the specific plans for the GST cuts now released following King Charles III’s speech from the throne on Tuesday. This will be applied as a rebate — the First-Time Home Buyers’ GST Rebate. For first-time buyers only, there will be zero GST applied on new homes sold at up to $1 million. For new properties bought at a price of between $1 million and $1.5 million, there will be a reduced GST for first-time buyers and their new homes. This means that for homes priced at up to $1 million, first-time buyers will save up to $50,000 by not having to pay the GST. Buyers with new, more expensive homes will be eligible for a reduced GST rebate, which falls incrementally from home prices of $1 million to $1.5 million. For example, a home price of $1.1 million would be eligible for a 20 per cent rebate of $40,000, a home price of $1.25 million would be eligible for a rebate of $25,000, and a home price of $1.4 million would be eligible for a rebate of $10,000. A “new home” purchase is defined as property bought from a new home by a builder, a self-built home or a self-contracted new home, or an acquisition of shares of a co-operative housing corporation. Individuals are eligible for the rebate if they are adults and Canadian citizens or permanent residents. As well, they must not have lived in a home that they owned or that their spouse or common-law partner owned in the calendar year or in the four preceding calendar years. This existing ownership status consideration exists both within and outside Canada. At least one of the purchasers in a sale must be a first-time buyer for use as their primary residence, with this individual required to occupy the home following the sale. The sale agreement must be made between May 27, 2025 and Dec. 31, 2030. Homes that have yet to be built under the agreement must begin construction before 2021, with substantial completion by no later than the end of 2035. For rebates for owner-built homes, an eligible individual — at least one of the owner-builders who qualify as a first-time homebuyer — can recover up to $50,000 of the GST or the federal part of the rebate. Construction on the property must begin on or after May 27, 2025, with substantial completion by the end of 2036. And as for the rebate through the co-operative housing corporation share acquisition, an individual can similarly claim up to $50,000. The acquisition and construction timelines are the same for this option. This amounts to an adjustment, expansion, and refinement of Carney’s promise made during the election campaign to eliminate the GST on “new and substantially renovated” home sales up to $1 million for first-time buyers. Conservative party leader Pierre Poilievre vowed to axe the GST for new homes up to $1.3 million, accounting for the higher home prices in markets such as Metro Vancouver and Greater Toronto. Carney’s policy move is endorsed by the Canadian Home Builders’ Association (CHBA), which states that they have been advocating for such changes for a long while, and that these regulations have not changed since the introduction of GST in 1991. They say the federal government at the time originally committed to adjusting the GST New Housing Rebate thresholds every two years to reflect changes in housing prices and protect housing affordability over time. But these thresholds have not been changed for about 35 years now. Prior to this week’s policy details announcement, the federal government offered a smaller rebate amount of up to $6,300 or 36 per cent of the GST payment that would be required for a home that costs $350,000 or less. If the home costs more than $350,000, the rebate is gradually reduced, with the rebate reaching zero for a home price of $450,000 and over. “For years, CHBA has been advocating for a change to the GST thresholds on new construction homes to help address housing affordability challenges in regions across the country, and this measure is a very positive step forward for Canadians,” said Kevin Lee, CEO of CHBA, in a statement. “Previously, without details around the implementation of this measure, Canadians wishing to enter the housing market were holding out on buying a new construction home, which results in fewer home starts, so it is encouraging that today first-time buyers can have the confidence to move forward.” But Lee suggests the rebate thresholds should be more expansive to provide a greater number of homeowners with relief. CHBA wants to see the zero GST threshold increased to new home prices of $1.5 million, with the gradual reduction kicking in for prices between $1.5 million and $2 million, which would expand the eligibility for first-time homebuyers in Metro Vancouver and Greater Toronto, where there are higher home prices. They are also urging the federal government to expand the rebate to all new homes

    Share this page
  • | | | |

    How Do Mortgages Work? Everything You Need to Know

    ByStan S.

    Why Get a Mortgage? The price of a home is often more than what a single individual or household can save. Therefore, many choose to buy a home or an investment property by putting down a deposit of typically 20% of the home’s purchase price, and obtaining a loan for the remaining amount. This assistance…

    Share this page
  • | | | | | |

    The Inheritance Boom: What Canada’s Wealth Transfer Means for Real Estate Investors

    ByStan S.

    Over the next two decades, Canada will witness the largest wealth transfer in history as Baby Boomers pass an estimated $1 trillion to their heirs.  This unprecedented shift will do more than just redistribute wealth—it’s poised to reshape the real estate market in profound ways.  For investors, it’s both an opportunity and a challenge worth…

    Share this page
  • | | |

    Understanding Insured, Insurable, and Uninsured Mortgages

    ByStan S.

    When shopping for mortgages, you’re likely to come across terms like insured, insurable, and uninsured mortgages.  These classifications impact the type of property you can purchase, how much you need for a down payment, and the interest rates available to you.  Let’s break down what these terms mean, their requirements, and examples to clarify how…

    Share this page
  • | |

    Two rental housing towers eyed for Kingsway near Fraser Street in Vancouver

    ByStan S.

    Nearly four years ago, a rezoning application was approved to redevelop the southeast corner of the intersection of Kingsway and Carolina Street — situated on the southernmost border of the Mount Pleasant neighbourhood of Vancouver — into a six-storey, mixed-use building with 80 secured purpose-built market rental homes. But the project — which was one of the larger rental housing proposals in Metro Vancouver at the time, prior to the current wave of proposals — did not proceed as planned. As it turns out, this is because the project was being redesigned for a much larger mixed-use rental housing concept under the prescriptions and stipulations of the City’s Broadway Plan. A new rezoning application has been submitted to redevelop 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., which entails a larger development site than the original concept — growing the available footprint by 50 per cent to over 30,000 sq. ft. The project is just west of the prominent intersection of Kingsway and Fraser Street. The original north site entails old low-rise commercial buildings, including a former funeral home building, while the addition of a south site includes a surface vehicle parking lot and low-rise residential and commercial buildings. Site of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) Site of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Google Maps) Site of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) Cancelled 2020/2021 concept: Current condition (top) and 2020/2021 cancelled concept (bottom) of 602-644 Kingsway, Vancouver. (Studio One Architecture) 2025 revised concept: 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) Under the new application, local developer Bonnis Properties has partnered with architectural firm Perkins&Will to pursue a 167-ft-tall, 14-storey north tower and a 276-ft-tall, 25-storey south tower. The proponents are pursuing a new concept with two high-rise towers, after determining that a project with three towers would not meet the minimum tower separation requirements from an adjacent lot on Kingsway. There will be a total of 327 secured purpose-built rental homes, including 120 units in the north tower and 207 units in the south tower. Based on the Broadway Plan’s requirement of setting aside at least 20 per cent of the residential rental floor area for below-market units, there will be 66 below-market rental homes and 261 market rental homes. The unit size mix is established as 152 studios, 47 one-bedroom units, 105 two-bedroom units, and 23 three-bedroom units. 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) The north and south towers will be physically connected on the second level by a pedestrian bridge over the laneway that separates the two sites, enabling continuous shared amenity spaces between both buildings. Expansive indoor and outdoor amenity spaces will be found on the second level — including landscaped outdoor areas on the base podium rooftops — along with outdoor amenity spaces on the rooftops of both towers. The rooftop of the north tower’s podium also features a 2,900 sq. ft. childcare facility for up to 20 kids, plus outdoor play space. Down below, about 19,400 sq. ft. of retail/restaurant space spread across the ground levels of both buildings will activate the street frontages and a new public plaza. This triangular-shaped plaza space — a public space element passed down from the original concept — will be achieved by repurposing a 70-ft-long segment of East 15th Avenue and median that parallels Kingsway. 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) 2025 concept of 602-644 Kingsway and 603-617 East 16th Ave., Vancouver. (Perkins&Will/Bonnis Properties) The floor plates of both towers rising above the podium are curved to strategically place the structural columns along the perimeter of the floor plates, which serves to optimize the views from the residential units and enable a more efficient unit layout. The exterior design is defined by a 40-60 window-to-wall ratio, with protruding balconies protected by steel picket guard railings. Four underground levels at the north tower site will accommodate 141 vehicle parking stalls, while two underground levels at the south tower site will provide over 600 secured bike parking spaces. Altogether, the project will generate a total floor building floor area of over 257,000 sq. ft., establishing a floor area ratio density of a floor area that is 8.5 times larger than the size of the lot. The site is well served by frequent bus routes along Kingsway, Fraser Street, and Main Street, and about a 15-minute walk from SkyTrain’s future Mount Pleasant Station (intersection of Main Street and East Broadway). Under the Broadway Plan, high-rise tower developments are generally

    Share this page