Incorporating Your Rental Property Business
| | | | | |

Incorporating Your Rental Property Business: Should You Do It? Here’s the Scoop

ByStan S.

So, you’ve finally taken the plunge into real estate, or maybe you’ve been collecting those sweet rental checks for a while. Either way, one question keeps popping up:

Should I incorporate my rental property business, or keep it under my personal name?

You’ve probably heard stories about big tax savings and bulletproof liability protection—but is that really the case for you?

Let’s peel back the layers and see what incorporation actually means, and whether it’s worth the paperwork, fees, and added complexity. By the end, you’ll have a clearer picture of what could work best for your situation (and hopefully a lot less confusion). 🏡💼

1. Taxes: The Good, the Bad, and the “Wait, What?”

📊 Personal vs. Corporate Tax

🔹 Personal Ownership: If you own property under your name, any rental income is taxed as part of your personal income. If you’re already in a high tax bracket (which can easily hit 45% or more in Canada), that’s a hefty bite out of your hard-earned rental income.

🔹 Corporate Ownership: If your company is a Canadian-controlled private corporation (CCPC) and your income qualifies as active business income, you might enjoy a lower tax rate (roughly 12–15% on the first $500,000).

  • The Catch: Rental income is usually deemed passive unless you own multiple properties (typically at least five) and have employees managing them. Passive income in a corporation often faces taxes closer to 50%.

🕒 The (Potential) Tax Deferral

A key perk of incorporating is that you pay personal tax only when you take out money as salary or dividends. If you’re aiming to reinvest profits (e.g., buying more properties), keeping income in the corporation can delay your personal tax bill, giving you more capital to expand faster.

💡 Quick Example:

  • Personal Income: If you earn $200,000 in net rental income, you could pay around $92,000 in taxes (46% rate).
  • Corporate Income: If taxed at 50%, you’d owe $100,000.
  • Tax Deferral Perk: Keeping the remaining $100,000 in the corporation lets you build funds to reinvest. The downside? When you eventually withdraw the money, you’ll still pay tax on dividends or salary.

💰 Losses and Write-Offs ✔ Personal Ownership: Rental losses (from renovations, vacancies, or depreciation) can reduce your overall personal income tax.
✔ Corporate Ownership: Losses stay within the corporation—you can’t offset your personal salary with corporate losses.

2. Liability: Protecting Your Nest Egg 🛡️

⚠️ Personal Ownership = Personal Risk

Imagine a tenant has a nasty fall and sues for $1 million. If the property is in your personal name, your personal assets (home, savings, investments) could be on the line if insurance doesn’t cover everything.

🏢 Corporate Ownership = A Safety Bubble (Kinda)

🔹 A corporation creates a legal separation between your personal assets and your rental properties.
🔹 However: Most lenders still require personal guarantees on mortgages, so liability protection isn’t always bulletproof.

3. Costs and Complexity: There’s No Free Lunch 💸

🔹 Formation Fees & Legal Costs: Setting up a corporation can cost a few thousand dollars.
🔹 Ongoing Accounting: Corporate tax returns, financial statements, and legal filings can cost a couple thousand per year.

📑 Extra Paperwork Galore

  • Annual corporate records, shareholder agreements, and legal compliance.
  • If you own just one or two properties, incorporation might be more trouble than it’s worth.

4. Long-Term Vision: Estate Planning & Beyond 🏦

📜 Easier Estate Planning

✔ Instead of transferring properties individually, you can transfer corporate shares, which may reduce probate fees and make succession planning smoother.

🚨 Watch Out for Capital Gains

❗ Moving a personally owned property into a corporation may trigger capital gains taxes immediately. Consult a tax expert before making a move.

💡 Example:

  • If you plan to gift rental properties to your children, transferring corporate shares can be cleaner than handing over individual deeds.

Should You Incorporate? The Verdict 🤔

✅ Go for Incorporation if:
✔️ You have (or plan to have) multiple properties generating significant income.
✔️ You reinvest profits rather than taking them out right away.
✔️ Liability protection is a key priority.
✔️ You’re thinking about estate planning or succession.

❌ Skip Incorporation if:
🚫 You own just one or two properties with modest rental income.
🚫 You rely on rental income immediately for personal expenses.
🚫 You don’t want the extra fees, accounting work, and legal complexities.

🏁 Bottom Line

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. If you’re scaling up or need extra liability protection, incorporation might be a smart move. But for small landlords, the added cost and complexity may not be worth it.

🎯 Your best bet? Talk to a tax advisor or financial planner who can tailor a strategy to your specific situation.

At the end of the day, incorporation isn’t just about taxes—it’s about how big you want to grow, how much personal risk you can tolerate, and how you plan to structure your future.

Now that you know the pros and cons, you can confidently map out the next step in your real estate journey. 🚀

Share this page

Similar Posts

  • | |

    BRRRR Math. The Formulas Every Investor Needs to Know Before Buying

    ByStan S.

    BRRRR isn’t driven by emotion—it’s powered by math. From acquisition to refinance, your success hinges on a few essential formulas. Mastering these numbers helps you evaluate deals confidently, avoid overpaying, and stay on track to hit your returns. Let’s break down the BRRRR math that separates good investors from lucky ones. 1. The 70% Rule (Buy…

    Share this page
  • | |

    Listings of Metro Vancouver Waterfront Properties updated by the hour

    ByStan S.

    Stan Direct: 604-202-1412E-mail: ssteam3000@gmail.com Click on the links below to view a few Vancouver Waterfront MLS® Listings for sale, updated every 2 hours. Play with the searches. Sort the listings by clicking the description at the top of each column. Click on the SOLD properties to see their actual selling price. Click on each property address…

    Share this page
  • |

    The Rent vs. Buy Dilemma: Decoding the Vancouver Market

    ByStan S.

    Navigating Vancouver’s housing market can feel like solving a Rubik’s Cube in the dark. With high home prices and rising rents, many people wrestle with one of life’s biggest financial questions: Should I rent or buy? While there’s no universal answer, understanding the pros and cons of each can help you make an informed decision. The Case…

    Share this page
  • | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Metro Vancouver rents remain depressingly high despite B.C. price drop

    ByStan S.

    British Columbia is tied for the largest annual decline in apartment rents in all of Canada, but Metro Vancouver renters may not be seeing the savings when it’s time to pay. According to the latest Rentals.ca and Urbanation report, which looks at numbers from June 2025, the country’s average asking rent for all residential properties declined 2.7 per cent year-over-year. It was the ninth consecutive month of annual rent drops. B.C. and Alberta experienced the biggest annual decline in apartment rents at 3.1 per cent. However, four of the top five most expensive cities to rent in the top Canadian markets list remain in the Metro Vancouver area. Alen Szylowiec/Shutterstock “Asking rents for purpose-built and condo rental apartments declined the most over the past year in B.C. and Alberta, each decreasing by 3.1 per cent, to an average of $2,472 and $1,741, respectively,” said Rentals.ca in its report. “Ontario and B.C. were the only provinces to record a two-year decrease in apartment rents, declining 3.6 per cent and 3.1 per cent, respectively.” According to Rentals.ca, North Vancouver is the most expensive municipality in Canada to rent for the fourth consecutive month, with the average asking rent for a one-bedroom rental reaching $2,602 per month and a two-bedroom rental coming in at $3,567 per month. Vancouver, Coquitlam, Burnaby, and Toronto round out the other five most expensive places to rent in the country. Rentals.ca The report also shows that among Canada’s six largest cities, Vancouver experienced the second-largest annual decline in apartment rents in June, dropping seven per cent. However, the asking rent for a one-bedroom is $2,529 per month, and for a two-bedroom, it is $3,388 per month. “Despite the dip in rents during the past year, average asking rents in Canada remained 4.1 per cent higher than the level from two years earlier ($2,042) and 11.9 per cent higher than the level from three years earlier ($1,899),” added Rentals.ca Volodymyr Kyrylyuk/Shutterstock Several other B.C. cities also cracked the 50 priciest Canadian markets to rent, including New Westminster at number 17, Victoria at number 19, Langley at number 21, Surrey at number 26, and Nanaimo at number 31. Average asking rents in Canada remain 5.7 per cent higher than two years ago and 12.6 per cent higher than three years ago. Are you a renter who’s seeing a drop in the asking rent price? Are you experiencing challenges finding a rental within your budget? Let us know in the comments or get in touch at [email protected] .

    Share this page
  • | | | | | | |

    Plan for 3 towers next to Commercial-Broadway station finally heads to public hearing

    ByStan S.

    After nearly a decade of proposals, pushback and debate, a plan to build a set of towers next to one of Metro Vancouver’s busiest transit hubs is getting a public hearing. About 100 people have signed up to speak for and against the proposed redevelopment of a Safeway lot next to the Commercial-Broadway SkyTrain station. The plan before council envisions three towers, with heights of 44, 38 and 37 storeys, comprising 1,044 rental homes. 2:14 Drastic changes made to Broadway-Commercial Safety redevelopment plan Ten per cent of those units would be secured at city-wide average market rates, while the remainder would lease for going market rates. Story continues below advertisement The proposal has generated strong feelings on both sides, with supporters arguing more housing is critically needed, particularly near transit, and opponents arguing the units won’t be affordable. “Vancouver has a crushing shortage of housing. For decades, we have not been building enough housing, and this neighbourhood, Grandview Woodlands, is a great example of this, we basically haven’t built much new housing there since the 1970s, and as a result the population there is actually declining … despite the fact this SkyTrain station we are talking about is one fo the busiest transit hubs in the country,” Peter Waldkirch, director of Abundant Housing, told CKNW’s The Jill Bennett Show. “Burnaby just proposed an 80-storey tower … it’s actually quite perverse, it’s backwards that we are building bigger and taller buildings than this in the suburbs than we are in the heart of the city.” Get daily National news Get the day’s top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Opponents like Craig Ollenberger, chair of the Grandview Woodland Area Council, say the proposed secured market rental requirement is far too low. A rendering of the trio of proposed towers for Commercial and Broadway in Vancouver. City of Vancouver 2:05 Public hearings on controversial East Vancouver development postponed again Speaking on CKNW’s The Jas Johal Show, he said the city should look to replicate what it did in the Broadway Plan, which is 20 per cent of units at 20 per cent below market rates. Story continues below advertisement “It is bringing nothing but 1,000 luxury rental units to our community, suites that nobody will be able to afford. And for that the city is only asking for 10 per cent of the units to be at market rent,” he said. “This community, the majority of people can’t afford market rent.” The proposed redevelopment would also include a 37-space child care facility, a ground-level public plaza and an upper-level courtyard. Trending Now The development has been contentious ever since it was first put forward in 2016, as part of the broader Grandview-Woodland Community Plan approved by the council led by then-mayor and now federal Housing Minister Gregor Robertson. Neighbourhood groups had rejected a previous version of the community plan, arguing it would radically change the neighbourhood’s character, and the pushback led to a municipal citizens’ assembly whose feedback was eventually integrated into the revised 2016 plan, which included a maximum tower height of 24 storeys. A proposal for the Safeway site envisioned two towers, one of them hitting that threshold. 2:04 Grandview Woodland development tour A subsequent version of the proposal, with the tallest tower reaching 30 storeys and composed mostly of condos, nearly made it to a public hearing in 2022, but was sidelined by the 2022 municipal election. Story continues below advertisement “The economics have changed. Rents were lower a few years ago … interest rates were lower … community expectations were different. I think when this project started getting negotiated, you could argue against the need for more housing more successfully,” said Tom Davidoff, an associate professor of economics at UBC’s Sauder School of Business. Davidoff said the pressure to get new units built and to comply with the provincial and federal governments’ transit-oriented density requirements will likely weigh in the project’s favour. The site would sit virtually on top of the intersection of two SkyTrain lines and the 99-B Line bus route. It’s TransLink’s third-busiest transit hub, and saw more than 6.2 million boardings in 2023. “If you can’t have density at the intersection of streets named Commercial and Broadway, where there is a major transit intersection, I don’t know where you want people to go,” Davidoff said. With scores of people signed up to speak, Wednesday’s hearing could go late into the evening, — with files from Alissa Thibault &copy 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

    Share this page
  • | | | |

    Canadians will see some new laws and rules kick in next month

    ByStan S.

    Several new laws and regulations will be implemented in Canada next month. From a bill that protects shoppers from deceptive marketing practices to expanded dental care, these changes could affect workers, consumers and low-income Canadians. Here are the new laws and rules you can expect in Canada in June 2025. Canadian Dental Care Plan expansion and renewal Jacob Lund/Shutterstock The Canadian Dental Care Plan (CDCP) now accepts applications from eligible people aged 18 to 34. On May 29, the program will expand to include those aged 35 to 54. The program was implemented in 2023 to decrease dental costs for Canadians earning less than $90,000 annually. If you’re already part of the dental care program, don’t forget to renew for the 2025 to 2026 period before June 1 to avoid a possible gap in coverage. To do this, you must have filed your 2024 tax return and received the notice of assessment from the Canada Revenue Agency. Check to see if you qualify for the CDCP. “Anti-scab” law In May last year, the federal government passed Bill C-58, a law that aims to protect unionized workers during strikes or lockouts. Under the legislation, which will take effect on June 20, federal employers won’t be able to use replacement workers, AKA “scabs,” to do the jobs of unionized employees during legal strikes or lockouts. This is an offence punishable by a fine of up to $100,000 per day. The exceptions to this law include needing to use a replacement worker to prevent threats to life, health or safety of the public and prevent serious damage or destruction to their property. However, employers need to offer the opportunity to bargaining unit members first. Law holding businesses more accountable for greenwashing Bill C-59, which kicked in on June 20, 2024, also brought important changes to the Competition Act, specifically when it comes to greenwashing, or misleading consumers about a business’s environmental impacts. According to Canadian law firm BLG, the changes to legislation won’t only make it easier for the Commissioner of Competition to hold companies accountable, but also for private parties like environmental activists and climate advocacy groups. Starting June 20 this year, these groups can bring action against companies for deceptive greenwashing marketing practices before the Competition Tribunal if they can show “public interest.”

    Share this page